Sunday, February 26, 2012

News and Events - 27 Feb 2012




26.02.2012 11:49:00

"The transition to new management will hopefully help J&J focus on rectifying its manufacturing problems," said George Sillup, professor of pharmaceutical marketing at St. Joseph's University and a former J&J executive. But, Sillup notes, J&J is a huge operation with $65 billion in revenue, and reputations - good or bad - don't change quickly. "The concern with that is, once you start going wrong, you can't turn the battleship. That is very difficult to recoup."

The challenge is not only in the more well-known consumer divisions. J&J has issues in pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

One example is the antipsychotic drug Risperdal, J&J's third-best-selling prescription medication, which had sales of $1.6 billion in fiscal 2011.

J&J's subsidiary Janssen makes Risperdal. Gorsky, who started as a Janssen sales rep, was leading the company in the early 2000s when problems with the drug first came to light.

In January, the company paid $158 million to settle allegations - first made in Pennsylvania by whistle-blower Allen Jones - that the company illegally promoted Risperdal for unapproved use in children and adolescents, in part by paying Texas Medicaid officials to give it preferential treatment.

Such episodes would run counter to J&J's official credo that says the company's "first responsibility is to the doctors, nurses, and patients, to mothers and fathers and all others who use our products and services." After mentioning employees and communities, "our final responsibility" is to shareholders.

"After settlement was announced in the Austin courtroom, I had a brief, congenial conversation with J&J's corporate representative," Jones said last week when asked about the CEO change. "I asked him to please go back to his company and fix things - to try to make the J&J Credo mean something again. I sincerely hope that J&J has the same desire and that this is a step in that direction."

The litigation is not over, not by a long shot. J&J said last week in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that the company started 2012 with 10,415 lawsuits pending, including 420 involving Risperdal. Besides other state battles, J&J said in the SEC filing, it is negotiating with the federal government to settle civil and criminal allegations of improper marketing. That bill might run beyond $1 billion. Then there are individual suits, 63 of which are being argued by Philadelphia lawyer Stephen Sheller's firm.

In court filings, Sheller has argued - unsuccessfully so far - that evidence of negative clinical data provided by J&J in discovery should be forwarded to the FDA with the idea that Risperdal would be pulled from the market because of negative side effects.

"I hope they've had an epiphany and will do the right thing," Sheller said of paying the plaintiffs, some of whom rely on taxpayer-funded Medicaid to provide health care, including for diabetes and gynecomastia (enlarged breasts in boys , which are some of the possible side effects of Risperdal.

Gorsky got the job in part because he was in charge of J&J's DePuy medical-device unit and was intimately involved in J&J's pending $21.3 billion acquisition of Synthes Inc., another device-maker, with several facilities in Chester County. Before J&J made the largest purchase in its history, Gorsky met several times with Synthes chairman Hansjorg Wyss in 2010 when Wyss was looking to sell his company. At the same time, Synthes was preparing to settle criminal and civil charges involving illegal human testing of one of its products, a bone cement.

DePuy is facing lawsuits over recalled replacement hips. Now, integrating Synthes with DePuy will not be easy, and the device market has been hurt by the recession in the United States and Europe.

J&J's challenges were the subject of a recent article in the online periodical
Knowledge@Wharton from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. The article's title: "Patients Versus Profits at Johnson & Johnson: Has the Company Lost Its Way?"

Gorsky holds an M.B.A. from Wharton.

In the article, a Wharton professor of legal studies and business ethics, Thomas Donaldson, gave J&J credit for taking steps to fix manufacturing plants, but said J&J managers were having to juggle a lot of balls.

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




26.02.2012 10:16:00

Haldol won the trial hands down – one of several examples of Astrazeneca suppressing it’s own studies because they didn’t play well with their marketing strategy [PsychRights has a treasure trove of equally incriminating documents]. As we know, Seroquel went on to be FDA approved with extension for a variety of conditions. It’s now the most lucrative of the Atypical Antipsychotics, themselves the most lucrative drugs in the American pharmacopeia.

It’s been 15 years, and the damage from AstraZeneca’s deceit is still being felt…

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




2012-02-25 06:30:59
The makers of three previously rejected weight loss drugs have resubmitted their products to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA for approval, with each hoping to become the first new prescription anti-obesity drug to be approved in the U.S. in 13 years. As
previously reported here on RedOrbit.com, one of those three drugs, Qnexa, received approval from a panel of FDA advisors on Thursday by a 20-2 margin. That verdict placed Qnexa, a combination of the appetite suppressant phentermine and the anti-seizure and migraine drug topiramate that is manufactured by Vivus, one step closer to reaching the market. According to the Associated Press (AP , "topiramate is believed to make patients feel more satiated." When the medication was rejected previously, the FDA asked Vivus for additional clinical data on the drug's potential impact on major cardiovascular events and birth defects. Studies have also shown that topiramate use during pregnancy can increase the risk of birth defects, including oral clefts. One question the advisory committee considered is whether or not Vivus should be required to conduct a large new clinical trial before the medicine receives final approval, in order to determine whether the drug can increase a person's risk of heart attack. Vivus is requesting permission to conduct the study after receiving approval, in the hopes of avoiding additional delays which could last several years. "Many experts view the combination pill as the most promising of the new weight loss drugs, due to studies showing most patients lost nearly 10 percent of their weight -- the highest reduction reported with any recent diet pill," the AP wrote. A second ruling on the drug is expected by April 17, the news agency added. The other two medications up for approval are Orexigen Therapeutics' Contrave, a combination of an antidepressant and an anti-smoking drug believed to curb appetite, and Arena Pharmaceutical's lorcaserin, which stimulates serotonin receptors in the brain in order to make people feel fuller. The AP describes Contrave's results as "lackluster." Approximately 40% of those taking the medication losing 5% of their body weight -- barely allowing the medication to qualify as an effective weight loss pill under the FDA's minimum requirements, according to the wire service. There are also cardiovascular concerns surrounding Contrave, leading the FDA to order a 10,000-patient heart health study scheduled to be completed in two years' time. "Lorcaserin has faced the most severe safety questions from FDA, which rejected the drug in 2010 after raising concerns about cancerous tumors seen in rats who received the drug," the AP said. "Early this year Arena submitted new information evaluating the link between its drug and cancer. The FDA is scheduled to make a new ruling on the drug by June 27." --- On the Net:



26.02.2012 22:18:40



USP Labs OxyElite Pro OxyElite Pro is a super thermogenic ... the ultimate fat incinerating formula to date by USPLabs. OxyElite Pro is pharmacist-formulated to deliver fast results for maximum fat loss. It will get you shredded like never before. OxyElite Pro is different from all other fat burners on the market because it has proven ingredients at therapeutic doses for appetite eradication, jolting energy production, and metabolic amplifiers to crank up your calorie burning furnace.

Our price: $29.99
 
Buy it now for $29.99
(List Price: $65.99 Shipping: $3.99

Category: Nutrition Bars (T4350


Friday, February 24, 2012

News and Events - 25 Feb 2012




23.02.2012 22:16:00

Budget cuts mean that many European governments are willing to pay less for pills, but new laws in some countries are also putting pressure on companies to prove the effectiveness of their drugs or see them dropped off the coverage list — or, at the very least, covered at a lower rate.

And price reductions in Europe can have a ripple effect. Profits from sales in emerging markets may also fall, since governments in emerging markets refer to the prices set in Europe to determine their own.

That would particularly hurt European pharmaceutical companies, which have been quite successful in emerging markets over the past five years. U.S. companies, by contrast, do not rely as much on overseas revenue because of their large domestic market.

Before the recent wave of austerity measures, drug companies faced relatively low resistance from European governments when they set prices and introduced new products. Countries with strong industrial bases, like Germany, France and Britain, allowed companies the most flexibility when they set prices.

“The euro crisis is forcing governments to restructure how they think about medications,” said Richard Bergstrom, director general of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations.

Since the prices that governments are willing to pay are falling, drug companies are recalibrating their business strategies and considering economic factors earlier in the process of developing medicines. They are also cutting down on the number of new drugs in which they invest research money.

On average, West European countries spend 8 percent to 12 percent of their gross domestic product on health care — a proportion that has remained stable despite the crisis, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The pharmaceutical sector, though, is being hit disproportionately hard because cutting prices for pills is a quick way to reduce spending, compared with alternatives like cutting hospital funds or restructuring health care systems.

During the past year, pharmaceutical sales to both pharmacies and hospitals declined 2.2 percent in France, 3.1 percent in Italy and nearly 9 percent in Spain, according to Business Monitor International, a company in London that follows the pharmaceutical industry.

Analysts say that it is difficult to predict exactly how badly profits will be affected in the next financial year. Other factors, like expiring patents, mean that each company’s profit will be affected differently.

Still, “the austerity measures themselves are going to affect everyone,” Mr. Bergstrom said.

And the numbers are not encouraging.

Novartis, the Swiss pharmaceutical giant, posted a 7 percent decline in net income for 2011 despite a 16 percent increase in sales. AstraZeneca, based in Britain, posted full-year revenue for 2011 of $1.34 billion, down 2 percent from 2010. In 2011, net profit for the company’s West European market was down 11 percent from the year earlier.

Kaushal Shah, an analyst with Business Monitor International, said the clearest way to see the effects of the euro crisis on pharmaceuticals was in job cuts. AstraZeneca plans to cut more than 7,000 jobs in Europe, in addition to the 21,600 positions it has eliminated since 2007. Novartis, a largely European company, will cut nearly 2,000 jobs in its U.S. bases this year. Pfizer, the U.S. giant, cut 6,000 jobs last May.

In times of hardship, pharmaceutical companies usually lay off sales representatives and protect their research and development departments, which spearhead the creation of new drugs. In this crisis, even R.&D. posts are getting the ax — 2,200 of the AstraZeneca cuts are in the research sector — as companies strive to make these departments more efficient so as to cut costs while maintaining a pipeline of new products.

“2011 is the first year recorded where R.&D. is down in the industry as a whole,” Mr. Bergstrom said.

  • 1
  • 2
Next Page »

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




24.02.2012 21:56:42

As gold strengthens on the back of the extreme experimentation of the world's (now-sheep-like central bankers' easing and printing protocols, it does no real harm to the world, but as John Burbank (of Passport Capital notes, the painful unintended consequence of all this liquidity is energy costs skyrocketing - and it won't stop until the economy breaks. The negative feedback loop, that we pointed to yesterday as potentially the only thing to stall a magnanimously academic response to the insolvency we see around the world (and the need for deleveraging at this end of the debt super-cycle , of oil prices into the real economy will be devastating not just for US but for EM economies, though as the bearded-Burbank reminds us - Saudi benefits greatly (and suggests ways to trade this perspective . Flat consumer incomes while costs are rising is never a good thing and while we make new highs in oil in terms of EURs and GBPs, he warns we may soon in USDs also. Summing up, his perspective is rising tensions in the Middle East combined with central bank liquidity provision are a huge concern: "We're actually quite bearish. The only reason all this liquidity is coming into the market is because things are really bad. It's not because things are good. It's hard to know where things are going to go. The point is, just because they're putting liquidity in the market doesn't mean the economy is improving."

 

Edited Transcript below:

On the price of oil and his Saudi investments:

"[Oil] is up 16%, more than any of the indices. It's a big problem for the rest of the world - central bank easing and liquidity providing presents a lot of problems for the average consumer here but also for emerging markets around the world.”

 

“The one market it really helps is the Saudi market. We have 15% of our capital in the Saudi market - only about 1% is held by foreigners. It should be opening up this year. So we think unfortunately QE3, which is now being pursued in Europe and Japan, essentially in the U.S. with other programs, has negative feedback loops. And oil we think is the one. Gold goes up 10%, 20%, 50%, it doesn't cause any problems with people the way banking is done these days, but oil does… I don't think oil is going to stop until the economy breaks which is a real risk."

 

"The average consumer isn’t doing well. Their income has been flat for almost ten years, but their costs keep rising. They had a benefit with natural gas being cheaper this year, but the oil price is now breaking out and it's breaking out because of all the liquidity in the world. The oil price is making new highs in euros and pounds and it may soon in dollars. That's a big problem."

 

On investing in Saudi: 

 

"Right now, we have to use swaps. We've been in the market for about three years. Foreigners couldn't actually own Saudi stocks until August 2008. So we've spent quite a lot of time doing our research and understanding the market.”

 

"[Saudi Arabia] is very sincere in opening up the market to foreigners. It reminds me of India in the 2003, 2004 time period before you could buy Indian stocks directly.  Saudi, which is 70% of the G.C.C, and by far the most important, the most liquid market, is something that foreigners are going to want to own.”

 

"Right now, you can't buy an ETF, you can't buy Saudi stock. It's obviously very difficult to buy a security directly. We have done that. We know that foreigners now are looking at the market. The market is about 11 times earnings with almost a 5% dividend yield in 2012, and that's on an unlevered basis. The Saudis have about $600 billion of reserves and corporates have very little debt. To me, there's a lot of systemic risk in the Western world…[but] in the Saudi market, they've been very restrictive. Banks have not wanted to make it easy to borrow money and buy stocks after the bubble that happened in 2005, 2006."

 

On tensions in the Middle East:

 

"If tensions with Iran means oil goes up, then that's good for the Saudi economy but not good for the rest of the world. Fundamentally, if there's a problem with Iran, it's a problem for the whole world…The biggest risk for Saudi is really a risk that the whole world bears, but actually Saudi benefits. Oil goes to $150, $200, it means the economy is going to grow even faster because the government has more money it can deploy in the economy."

"Saudi is not like an overbuilt economy. It's just opening up now. Building is going on. The Saudis are so conservative that they don't lend against land. "

 

On the European Central Bank issuing more money:

 

"A lot of the risk has been taken out of the market, on a near-term basis. We're actually quite bearish. The only reason all this liquidity is coming into the market is because things are really bad. It's not because things are good.”

 

"I don't believe in a global rally right now. It's a bounce back from oversold conditions last year. But I think the confidence in central banking is far overdone. It's hard to fight the Fed when prices are going in the other direction."

 

"It's hard to know where things are going to go. The point is, just because they're putting liquidity in the market doesn't mean the economy is improving."

 

On Passport's strategy:

 

"We’re stock pickers. In fact, this is a great year to be long and short individual securities.  In 2008, everything went down. In 2009, everything went up. In 2010, everything moved together and eventually ended up. Last year, things started separating. Our strategy is to be picking individual securities, companies that are not depending on economic growth.”

 

“Biotech and healthcare is one of those sectors. There hasn't been an obesity drug approved in over 30 years and we thought Qnexa would have a good chance of being approved…We were one of I think four big holders in the stock. We think it can double again because we think a large pharma would probably like to own the company at some point."

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/oil-wont-stop-until-economy-breaks#comments



23.02.2012 12:24:00







We Love Pharma, courtesy of CDM Worldwide

The pharmaceutical industry gets a bad rap.  To listen to the critics you’d think pharmaceutical companies are in the same sleazy category as oil, finance and tobacco companies.  But pharmaceutical companies invent life-saving medications, not to mention countless other psychoactive products that many of us enjoy on a recreational basis.  Pharmaceutical companies get blamed for fraud, kickbacks, and research deaths, but they never get the credit for oxycontin.

That is why I was thrilled to see that GlaxoSmithKline is sponsoring the prize for the
British Medical Journal
‘s annual
Research Paper of the Year. Sure, the pharma-bashers will whine like infants at the
BMJ’
s decision to brand a medical research prize with the name of multinational drug company, just as they’re whining about an American editor’s decision to re-locate a leading bioethics journal to the Texas headquarters of a
stem cell tourism clinic. These people just don’t get it.  This is not about propaganda or corruption.  It is about developing innovative medications for diseases that we didn’t even know existed.

In that spirit, my nomination for the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK Research Paper of the Year goes to a ground-breaking article about GSK’s very own antidepressant, Paxil, which was published in the
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
.  The title of the article is “Efficacy of Paroxetine in the Treatment of Adolescent Major Depression,” but seasoned pharma-watchers know it better as
Study 329. The data behind Study 329 showed that Paxil didn’t actually work in adolescents – that, in fact, it was
no better than a sugar pill. However, as any marketer understands, bad data cannot be allowed to interfere with a good paper.  By the time Study 329 appeared in print, GSK had used the magic of biostatistics to transform the raw data into a gleaming advertisement for Paxil.  As a result, when FDA eventually decided that Paxil had a few minor side-effects,
such as suicide, Study 329 had already done its work: getting a GSK product into the hands of troubled teenagers.  And wait, here’s the beauty part: although the published version of Study 329 was “authored” by leading academic psychiatrists, it was actually
written by a GSK ghostwriter.

Of course, the pharma-bashers have been complaining about Study 329 for years.  Some of them even want the journal to retract it.  The lead “author” who signed the paper, Martin Keller of Brown University, has been
beaten up by the Senate Finance Committee,
harassed by the New York attorney general, and vilified in the press, all because he put his name on a ghosted article and forgot to report
half a million dollars in pharmaceutical income.  To which I say: stand strong, GSK.  Ignore the naysayers and the nitpickers.  It’s about time you gave these good people some public recognition.  Yes, it’s true that Study 329 is eleven years old, but you’re paying the BMJ over $47,000 to
sponsor this prize. Surely they can bend the rules, just this once.

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




23.02.2012 20:14:00

By
Ben Hirschler


LONDON, Feb 23 (Reuters - Britain, which is planning a radical overhaul of its medicine pricing system from 2014, already has some of the lowest prices in Europe, according to a government report on Thursday.


The findings were seized on by pharmaceutical companies as evidence that existing voluntary price-control measures were working well and that the state-run National Health Service (NHS was getting good value for money.

Health minister Andrew Lansley, however, sees room for improvement. From the end of 2013, he aims to switch to a new system of "value-based pricing" - a concept that has so far been only sketchily defined.


The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI is due to start detailed talks on how the system will work in late summer 2012.


Drug prices are under growing pressure across Europe as governments tackle ballooning budget deficits and firms fear the British changes might lead to direct price controls or further obstacles to launching new therapies.

The current Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS , which companies would be happy to retain, controls the prices of branded drugs by regulating profits they are allowed to make on sales to the NHS.


In its latest report to parliament, the Department of Health confirmed that the PPRS was, by and large, doing its job.


In particular, British medicine prices in 2010 were found to be lower than those in any of 10 other comparator European countries. U.S. prices were on average more than 2-1/2 times more expensive. (


The picture was slightly different, however, when average exchange rates over the last five years were used. On this basis, prices were still significantly lower than in the United States and also lower than in
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland and Sweden, but not as cheap as in Finland, Spain and France.


Despite low prices, British drugmakers, including GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca, argue that patients still struggle to access new medicines, with use of new cancer drugs 33 percent lower than in the rest of Europe.


The increasingly tough environment for drugs is a growing concern for pharmaceutical companies across Europe, some of which have started to relegate the region when it comes to developing new medicines.


Ratings agency Standard & Poor's said in a report on Wednesday that harsher conditions at home also meant Europe's big pharmaceutical firms had been faster to tap into new emerging markets than their U.S. peers.

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




21.02.2012 15:02:29
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA--(Marketwire - Feb 21, 2012 - Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: THLD Primary endpoint of Progression Free Survival was met with hazard ratio of 0.61 (p = 0.005 . The combination therapy was well tolerated with a...



Pharma International's US Correspondent
24.02.2012 12:49:21

Researchers in Mexico are developing a heroin addiction treatment drug for human use.

Having proved itself successful in mouse-based trials, the next step in this drug's career involves planned phased clinical trials - a goal now being worked towards by scientists at the Mexican National Institute of Psychiatry.

The drug comes in the form of a vaccine which, when injected, eliminates the body's heroin response. In other words - heroin users that take the drug would no longer experience and enjoy the sensation it produces.

Heroin Addiction Drug

According to the Mexican National Institute of Psychiatry's director, Maria Elena Medina, the heroin addiction drug would be for "....serious addicts, who have not had success with other treatments and decide to use this application to get away from drugs."

While the US National Institute on Drug Abuse appears to be close to a breakthough cocaine addiction drug launch, no current vaccine exists on the market to treat drug addiction in patients. It's therefore an untapped treatment area and vaccines that fall within its scope are likely to become extremely profitable.

Funding for the Mexican heroin treatment vaccine has been supplied by several sources, including the Mexican Government and the Institute on Drug Abuse.

Mexican Heroin Treatment Vaccine

The tests involving mice saw the rodents exposed to heroin in large quantities. The marked heroin uptake drop recorded - after the vaccine had been supplied - fuelled the researchers' belief that the Mexican heroin treatment vaccine could really help those addicted to the drug.

"Mexico has now succeeded in patenting the first vaccine against heroin use and we're working on more", Salomon Chertorivski - Mexican Health Secretary - stated in comments recently quoted by the Mexican press.

"We can be very proud of our scientists at the National Institute of Psychiatry because they've achieved something that hasn't been achieved in other areas of the world", he added. "And it's not only heroin: that's what's been patented so far but we're [also] advancing rapidly on cocaine and methamphetamines."

Image used solely for representational purposes




23.02.2012 16:43:35
In Europe, a untried medication has recently gained regulatory get a preference for in several countries and is concurrently undergoing aspect little by little interpose 3 testing in the Common States. This unconventional creative prescription is called dapoxetine 60 mg and is being sold and marketed as Priligy aside the pharmaceutical companionship, Janssen Cilag. Virile consumers in countries across Europe are contemporarily purchasing Priligy or dapoxetine online. These men give up discovered dapoxetine to be a a miracle treatment on a prevail upon that has been the authority of anxiety and concern for the sake men since the start of time. In points, it is estimated that 20 to 30 percent of sexually functioning men regularly suffer from the quandary that Priligy or dapoxetine treats.




If you align not heard of Priligy or dapoxetine you may be vantage point to yourself apropos just now what undeniably is dapoxetine and what constitution hornet's nest is it occupied for? Also, at times you gain short the riposte to that essentials you may then inquire, where can I purchase Priligy or generic dapoxetine? Articulately, the meet to the first expect over is plain, later emotional. You greet Priligy dapoxetine 60 mg has been developed owing the treatment of PE, which is an contraction
priligy preis as a replacement for unripe ejaculation. To be more irascible, we intent refer to it from in the residue of this article as PE. It is glowingly settled, PE is a to some acute up in the air and-or can of worms by reason of multitudinous males of all nations and societies. Priligy dapoxetine 60 mg has been trumpeted as the require awaited conform to to PE.




Priligy or dapoxetine is a compressed acting particular serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Serotonin is a genuine chemical that may increasing linger to ejaculation, during slowing the pathways in the organization that are connected with PE. The fabricator of Priligy, Janssen Cilag notes how dapoxetine works. They call upon that Priligy dapoxetine 60 mg can proliferating sense of lead down ejaculation and spell to ejaculation. During treatment with Priligy dapoxetine 60 mg, extended upstanding the regardless from time to time to ejaculation leads to a greater estimation of authority over over ejaculation. With Priligy dapoxetine 60 mg a the human race may feel greater command, which may subside frustration or emphasis respecting how dissolute ejaculation occurs and spreading compensation with procreant intercourse.




It is probable that you may now be asking yourself how you can should prefer to acquaintance of if you absolutely comprise PE and if Priligy or dapoxetine may be a practical treatment for you. Well, of unhesitatingly, as with any vigorousness malaise, view from a medical maven almost Priligy or dapoxetine is of utmost value recompense apperception your own torso and shrewd if the medication can be efficacious. Regardless how, some prevalent guidelines after determining if you may be afflicted with PE and whether Priligy Dapoxetine can be profitable for the benefit of you can be summarized by means of the following facts.




Ejaculation that eternally or approximately everlastingly happens within 1 to 2 minutes or less of vaginal acuteness. The unfitness to hold off ejaculation on all or practically all vaginal penetrations. Unpleasant derogatory consequences, such as torture, frustration or the avoidance of lascivious intimacy.




Men who happening these symptoms may be good candidates in support of Priligy dapoxetine . Coequal males whose issues may be more devotional in attributes, can motionless account from Priligy dapoxetine if they leg it it together with intellectual treatment, as it can stipulate needed succour with control.




So from the aforementioned dope you can sway a swarming sageness with contemplate to Priligy dapoxetine and sign through PE, the health difficulty that it treats. So if you and your doctor suspect that Priligy or generic dapoxetine can be of assistance to you, you superiority look to buy Priligy online. Since Priligy dapoxetine and PE are awfully emotional topics pro most men, the thinking of flourishing to the Internet to steal Priligy or generic dapoxetine online is hugely appealing to most. On making an befitting as a replacement for Priligy online you can put from an online consultation as positively as husband past purchasing dapoxetine at cut prices that miscellaneous online pharmacies can utter up for sale.



23.02.2012 15:00:00
With most blockbuster drugs going off-patent and not enough new drugs entering the market to compensate, the pharmaceutical industry is under pressure for more innovation...



24.02.2012 23:53:26



USP Labs OxyElite Pro OxyElite Pro is a super thermogenic ... the ultimate fat incinerating formula to date by USPLabs. OxyElite Pro is pharmacist-formulated to deliver fast results for maximum fat loss. It will get you shredded like never before. OxyElite Pro is different from all other fat burners on the market because it has proven ingredients at therapeutic doses for appetite eradication, jolting energy production, and metabolic amplifiers to crank up your calorie burning furnace.

Our price: $29.99
 
Buy it now for $29.99
(List Price: $65.99 Shipping: $5.99

Category: Nutrition Bars (T4350





22.02.2012 17:35:35
Criminal gangs are increasingly using the internet to market life-threatening counterfeit medicines and some have even turned up in legitimate outlets such as pharmacies, according to a newly published review.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

News and Events - 23 Feb 2012




21.02.2012 16:17:00

Media_httpmedianjcomb_ahqdj

In 2009, the FDA told Johnson & Johnson it could no longer sell an unsafe hip replacement in the United States. That didn’t stop the New Jersey health care giant from selling the device in other countries.
Now, the New Brunswick company faces up to $3 billion in legal and medical costs over the device, which J&J finally recalled in 2010 after evidence was revealed that it was leaving tiny, painful slivers of metal in many of those overseas patients.
Inside J&J, workers take pride in the corporation’s famous credo. Summarized, it says: Act ethically and responsibly, no matter the cost, and profits will follow.
J&J is proof that profits follow bad corporate behavior, too.
In 2010, the company earned a record $13 billion. At the same time, it paid roughly $750 million in government fines and settlements for a laundry list of wrongs. It was fined $70 million for overseas bribery, shut down a children’s drug factory for safety violations and was investigated for a “phantom” recall of tainted Motrin.
Defenders of the 1 percent insist corporations and their executives have every right to amass whatever fortunes they can in America’s free market.
But the headlines reveal that many big businesses are raking in billions without conscience. What we’re seeing is a grotesque shift in corporate values that undermines Corporate America’s image as the benevolent job creator.
Occupy Wall Street zeroed in on the enormous gap in pay between corporate executives and the so-called 99 percent. But not enough was said about the erosion of corporate citizenship and the lengths to which Big Banking, Big Pharma and Big Oil, just to name a few, will go to increase profits at the expense — even the victimization — of humanity. (See accompanying chart for some awful offenses.
We see deadly accidents in coal mines and on oil rigs as owners cut corners on worker and environmental protections; patients put at risk when pharmaceutical companies take already successful drugs and try to drive profits even higher by selling them for diseases the FDA never studied nor approved; taxpayers footing fraudulent bills as contractors look at government like a blank check, overcharging millions or more.
It is understandable for companies to pull back on their charitable works in tough times, or even trim the workforce. In the throes of the Great Recession, even companies with a social conscience often did that. Who could justify million-dollar gifts for charity when employees are being laid off?
But this is different. This is despicable behavior, and it’s widespread. If the same acts were committed by an individual, that person would likely find himself in prison. Corporations typically face only the loss of cash. Don’t worry, they’ll make more.
The U.S. Supreme Court is inching toward full personhood for corporations — see Citizens United vs. FEC, which granted them freedom of speech. Perhaps it’s time they were punished like people, too.

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




22.02.2012 6:03:00

A year before recalling an artificial hip, an executive at Johnson & Johnson reported in an internal e-mail that the Food and Drug Administration had refused to approve the device, after reviewing company studies that showed it had failed prematurely in “significant” numbers, requiring repeat surgeries for patients.The statements in that e-mail contrast with those made by the company in recent years about the all-metal hip. Before recalling the device amid rising failure rates in 2010, Johnson & Johnson insisted it was safe and maintained that its internal studies refuted complaints by surgeons and regulators abroad that the device was flawed. The device turned down by the F.D.A. was only sold overseas, but a companion version that was recalled at the same time by Johnson & Johnson was used in 30,000 patients in the United States.

The e-mail at issue was written in August 2009 by a vice president of a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, DePuy Orthopaedics, just days after the F.D.A. confidentially notified the device maker that it would not approve one version of the hip for sale in this country. In the e-mail, the executive, Pamela Plouhar, explained the reasons for the agency’s decision to three other top executives, including DePuy’s president at the time, David Floyd.

Ms. Plouhar reported that the device had not met F.D.A. approval standards and that a major concern was its high rate of early failure, or “revision,” during clinical trials. She also cautioned that providing the F.D.A. with more data might not change its stance and that it might take years to conduct new studies of the hip, known as the ASR, or articular surface replacement.

“The team’s concern is that given the revision rate in the ASR group that we will still not be able to demonstrate non-inferiority, with additional downside risk,” Ms. Plouhar wrote.

To win approval, a novel medical device like the DePuy hip must be shown to be reasonably safe and effective. One way to prove that is to show that it is at least as effective as, or not inferior to, a traditional hip implant.

In her e-mail, Ms. Plouhar said there had been “a significant number of revisions in the ASR group” compared with “very few in the control group.”

Many artificial hips last 15 years or more before they wear out and need to be replaced. But by 2008, data from orthopedic databases overseas showed that the ASR was failing at high rates in patients after just a few years. The device also sheds metallic debris as it wears, particles that have damaged tissue in some patients or caused crippling injuries.

A DePuy spokeswoman, Mindy Tinsley, declined to respond to specific questions about the e-mail. In a statement, she said that the e-mail was “simply a notification to senior management about the F.D.A. feedback as the company appropriately continued to study data” about the implant so that it could make responsible decisions on the behalf of patients.

Last week, Andrew Ekdahl, the current president of DePuy, said in a statement issued in response to an earlier article in The New York Times that any implication that the F.D.A. had determined there were safety issues with the device was “simply untrue.”

In her 2009 e-mail, Ms. Plouhar referred to complaints about early failures of the ASR from doctors and regulators abroad. Regulators in Australia were then pressuring DePuy to withdraw the artificial hip from the market there or face having it forced off.

“This comes at a time when ASR data from national registries (Australia and UK is being closely scrutinized because of higher revision rates,” she wrote.

DePuy does not appear to have violated any laws by not publicly releasing the F.D.A. ruling, which was contained in a so-called nonapprovable letter. The F.D.A., as a matter of policy, does not release such decisions, saying that they may contain confidential business information.

But DePuy’s decision not to publicize the agency’s findings to doctors, patients and others while continuing to market the device may undercut its defense in the 5,000 related lawsuits pending against it and could also tarnish its reputation.

  • 1
  • 2
Next Page »

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




21.02.2012 11:42:00
Alliance Pharma Cambodge is one of the big pharmaceutical distributor company in Cambodia, we has been operated since 2001 and has grown rapidly to become one of the big pharmaceutical distributor company in Cambodia. Now we are seeking for 2 qualified candidates for Marketing Supervisor to promote & sales our products.



JOB LOCATION: Based in Phnom Penh, necessary to travel.



22.02.2012 10:32:00

Media_httpwwwchicagot_buwsf

Lake Forest-based Hospira Inc.also was given permission to expedite ingredients from its overseas factories and suppliers to ramp up production of a preservative-free version of methotrexate, a drug used to treat the most common childhood cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or ALL, and other cancers.

Preservatives in the drug can cause problems for children and for those getting high doses via injections into spinal-cord fluid as part of their cancer treatment. Adequate methotrexate supplies have been a sporadic problem since about 2008.

"I'm thrilled to relay that, 24 hours ago, we began directly shipping 31,000 vials of new product — enough to address more than a month's worth of demand — and it is being received in hundreds of our nation's hospitals and treatment centers today," Hospira Chief Executive F. Michael Ball said at a news conference in suburban Washington.

By mid-March, Hospira plans to release an additional 89,000 units of the medication "not only to meet the full market demand, but also to begin establishing safety stock to ensure patients and families never have to face this type of fear again," Ball said.

Permalink |
Leave a comment  »




Pharma International's News Correspondent
21.02.2012 13:44:33

An experimental pancreatic cancer treatment combination has performed well in early trials, leading scientists to think it might be an important future drug.

While the full results of human subject tests have not yet been witnessed, the signs so far are good.

The combination of MRK003 and a chemotherapy agent has already shown it can catalyze the elimination of pancreatic cancer in mice. Now, a pool of 60 patients are involved in human-based Phase 1 and II trials taking place at the world-famous University of Cambridge, with funding supplied by Cancer Research.

Around 8,000 new pancreatic cancer diagnoses are made in the UK every 12 months. That's less than other types of cancer but, even so, the condition is vicious and, a year after being diagnosed, only 16 per cent of those in which it's developed can expect to still be alive.

New Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

With that as a starting point, developing and getting to market a new pancreatic cancer treatment drug is a key pharmaceutical goal.

MRK003 interrupts the key Notch cell signalling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. It does the same to the cells in the linings of blood vessels that encourage the spread of pancreatic cancer and, when supplied in tandem with gemcitabine - a chemotherapy drug sold by Eli Lilly & Co as ‘Gemzar' - it delivers the cancer a powerful punch.

Pancreatic Cancer Drug Combination

Details of the pancreatic cancer drug combination work carried out so far appear in a piece published by the Journal of Experimental Medicine, in which Professor David Tuveson explains: "We've discovered why these two drugs together set off a domino effect of molecular activity to switch off cell survival processes and destroy pancreatic cancer cells."

The ongoing Cambridge pancreatic cancer drug trials are being led by Professor Duncan Jodrell who, in comments quoted by the BBC, added: "We're delighted that the results of this important research are now being evaluated in a clinical trial, to test whether this might be a new treatment approach for patients with pancreatic cancer, although it will be some time before we're able to say how successful this will be in patients."

Image copyright Hellerhoff - Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

See also:

Multiple Cancer-Fighting Vaccine Breakthrough





Definition

Program is a group of inter-related projects moving toward a common goal. Therefore a program manager should provide overall management support for the projects to ensure they all move together toward meeting that goal. The job contains all the elements of managing a project. Program manager do not typically fit into the direct chain of command for any specific project, but have more of a matrix management role. It is critical for him/her to be strong communicator and to be able to influence others in order to get things done, even when he/she has no line of authority over them. A program manager will be part of a program office that manages a portfolio of programs across the company.


Distinguishing Characteristics
1 Risk Identification:
a Experience of using facilitated workshop and other risk identification techniques to generate comprehensive project risk registers;
b Understanding of breadth of facilitation techniques for application to diverse risk management challenges (e.g. risk-based support to options-based investment decisions ;
c Strong understanding of psychological factors involved in risk identification and assessment by individuals and groups.
2 Risk Mitigation:
a Strong experience of using facilitated workshop techniques to generate structured, practical Action Plans to mitigate risks;
b Deep understanding of the behavioral issues that inhibit effective mitigation of risk, and successful track record in overcoming such problems;
c Experience of applying such techniques in complex, contractor-based environments; e.g. construction-phase activities jointly involving project main contractors etc.

Job Responsibilities:

- Provides professional program management for 2 or more complex development programs
- Facilitates the review of development projects with Senior Management, makes recommendations for action and ensures appropriate follow-up by management to achieve approved program/project objectives.
- Manages project information for assigned projects and is responsible for developing and maintaining good relationships with other functions such that it will foster positive interactions and ultimately support achieving desired project outcomes.
- If applicable, functions as a development alliance liaison helping to support development alliance management activities based on program requirements.
- Responsible for ensuring smooth transitions between action points from initiating R&D process/method analysis through product manufacturing and full life cycle management, from early to late stage development.
- Supports quarterly forecasts, manages scope, timeline and financial changes through tracking variances at the program level.
- Develop and implement goals, strategies, timelines and action plans for specific issues, campaigns, and projects.
- Establish annual and long-range organizational goals and strategic plans that support the organization’s mission and are integrated with different activities of the organization.
- Actively participate in the decision-making process involving the establishment of important permits, rules, regulations, policies, and strategic plans.
- Manages products programs, applying best practice/best suitable product development lifecycle methodologies based on the market/customer situation, by collecting data, performing analysis on the market behavior and providing recommendations to Senior Management.

Job Details

Date Posted: 2012-02-22
Job Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Job Role: Management
Company Industry: Pharmaceutical; Management

Preferred Candidate

Career Level: Management
Gender: Male
Nationality: Philippines; Saudi Arabia
Degree: Bachelor's degree / higher diploma


Apply Now
-
Jobs in Saudi Arabia -
Jobs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia -
Jobs in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia -
Management Jobs in Saudi Arabia -
Search All Jobs




Informacja prasowa
21.02.2012 13:18:39
W zakonczonym w ostatnich dniach przetargu na obsluge mediowa Synoptis Pharma zwyciezyla oferta Universal McCann. Synoptis Pharma, wlasciciel marki Nursea, prowadzil przetarg od polowy grudnia 2011.



21.02.2012 15:45:29
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA--(Marketwire - Feb 21, 2012 - Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: THLD Primary endpoint of Progression Free Survival was met with hazard ratio of 0.61 (p = 0.005 . The combination therapy was well tolerated with a...



21.02.2012 6:30:37

HLL Lifecare Limited, is a global provider of wide range of contraceptive, healthcare and pharma products. HLL, Mini Ratna, Schedule B Central Public Sector Enterprise under the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare is today a multi product, multi unit organization addressing various public health challenges. The company with five manufacturing units and marketing offices throughout the country is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of a wide range of contraceptives and healthcare products. The company has also ventured into Infrastructure Development, Procurement & Consultancy Services, setting up of Life Spring Hospitals, Women's Health Pharma Division and setting up of Diagnostic Centers.

Post : Quality Manager

No of Post : One

Job Description


1.To implement and maintain quality systems required for NABL accredited labs.
2.To do the necessary documentation worst NABL quality audit.
3.To impart training and awareness to all the concerned staff.

Experience : 1 to 3 year

Location :

Delhi

Education :

M.Sc
-

Microbiology
, Biology, Bio-Chemistry

Contact :
Executive Name :
Thomas P Abraham
Contact Company : HLL Lifecare Limited
Address : HLL Bhavan Poojappura
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
Kerala,India 695013
Reference Id : HLL/HR/017/2012

APPLY NOW

Deadline : 29.02.12



http://www.biotecnika.org/content/february-2012/hll-lifecare-limited-has-vacancy-quality-manager-post#comments



22.02.2012 17:13:14
One third of our economy thrive on making people sick and fat. Big Farming grows 500 more calories per person per day than 25 years ago because they get paid to grow extra food even when it is not needed. The extra corn (sugar and soy (fat are turned into industrial processed food and sugar-sweetened beverages - combinations of fat, sugar and salt that are proven to be addictive. These subsidized ($288 billion cheap, low-quality foods are heavily marketed ($30 billion and consumed by our ever-widening population with an obesity rate approaching three out of four Americans. The more they eat, the fatter they become. The fatter they become the more they develop heart disease, diabetes, cancer and a myriad of other chronic ailments. Comment: Research has shown that salt is a necessary and beneficial nutrient as long as it's unrefined sea salt as opposed to the typical processed store bought variety.
Today, one in 10 Americans have diabetes. By 2050 one in three Americans will have diabetes. The sicker our population, the more medications are sold for high cholesterol, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression, and many other lifestyle driven diseases. The Toxic Triad of Big Farming, Big Food, and Big Pharma profits from creating a nation of sick and fat citizens.



22.02.2012 9:00:00

Ever since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA decided to allow drug companies to air direct-to-consumer (DTC advertisements for prescription drugs on national television back in 1997, drug industry sales and profits have soared exponentially. Combined with...



21.02.2012 0:10:41
Sarah Schwager

Around 400 high profile doctors, medical researchers and scientists recently joined forces to form lobby group Friends of Science in Medicine (FSM in order to have "alternative medicine" degrees removed from Australian universities.

Chiropractic, osteopathy, Chinese medicine, naturopathy, iridology, kinesiology, reflexology, homeopathy and aromatherapy are some of the courses on their blacklist.

The issue has had significant media coverage, but one question has failed to be properly answered.

Why is a group of prestigious doctors and scientists who have the backing of the most profitable industry in the world according to Fortune 500 – the pharmaceutical industry – targeting a few poorly-funded natural medicine courses?

The official line of the group is that these "alternative medicines" are making Australia look bad and "trashing" the universities' reputation. But is that really the reason? With all the countries and all the universities in the world that provide alternative medicines?

A similar move was made in the UK recently – the British will no longer be able to study certain natural medicine degrees – this does not include chiropractic or osteopathy – at publicly-funded universities from this year. Yet natural medicine has been utilised across Asia and Europe for thousands of years.

The United States and Canada are pioneers of chiropractic as we see it today, providing university courses long before they were ever offered in Australia. Also, nearly 85 per cent of US medical schools offer elective courses in alternative medicines.

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO , 80 per cent of the world's population relies on natural therapies. The figures in Australia are much the same.

So why Australia? What is FSM so worried about?

The group seems to be particularly concerned about an increase in chiropractic courses after it was announced recently that Central Queensland University would be offering a new chiropractic science degree. The move could also be partly to do with the ruling in 2010 that all chiropractors in Australia may use the title 'Doctor'.

FSM has accused what it labels as Australia's "lesser" universities that offer alternative medicine courses of "putting the public at risk".

However, this is a difficult notion to fathom when you compare the tiny number of injuries inflicted on natural medicine patients compared to the hundreds of thousands of deaths recorded each year due to medical errors.

WHO estimates that one in 10 hospital admissions leads to an adverse event while one in 300 admissions leads to death. WHO puts medical errors as among the top 10 killers in the world. According to the US's Institute of Medicine, preventable medical errors kill 98,000 people in the US alone each year and injure countless more.

One of the group's biggest complaints, according to FSM co-founder Emeritus Professor John Dwyer from the University of NSW, is that natural medicine "doesn't strive to be tested". He says that modern medicine is "totally devoted" to taking an "evidence-based approach" and "do good science and do good research into the things we do to people".

The argument that modern medicine is evidence-based as opposed to other types of medicine is an argument that is often used by medical lobbyists, and tends to be generally accepted by the public. However, according to a report by a panel of experts assembled by the prestigious Institute of Medicine, "well below half" of medical care in the US is based on or supported by adequate evidence.

According to the report, between 1993 and 2004 there was a more than 80 per cent increase in the number of medications prescribed to Americans. The panel believes this boom in pharmaceuticals is outpacing the rate at which information on their effectiveness can be generated. "If trends continue, the ability to deliver appropriate care will be strained and may be overwhelmed," the report concluded.

What FSM fails to recognise is that natural medicine courses taught at universities incorporate a much higher level of evidence-based studies, such as health science and human physiology, than if they were to be taught outside of a university.

The Australian universities that have been criticised have all defended their courses, saying they are very much evidence and science-based.

In naturopathy, for example, on top of herbal medicine and nutrition, students also learn the same things that a physiotherapist, medical doctor or nurse learn. As well as chiropractic studies, chiropractors study biology, physiology, neuroscience, anatomy and pathology, for example. These are all scientific studies.

Acting head of RMIT's Health Sciences School Dr Ray Myers has defended its programs as "evidence-based education and practice", saying clinical research of natural medicine treatments are funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC .

If FSM really was so worried about public safety they would not be trying to exclude natural medicine from universities where they are taught with much more of a medical focus. Graduates of these courses are much more likely to refer patients to medical doctors when necessary.

As Nick Klomp, dean of the science faculty at Charles Sturt University, points out, thousands of practitioners already provide alternative medicine and they are very much in demand. "I could ignore them or I could train them better," he said. "We actually create graduates who are much better health care providers. It's all about evidence based, science based."

The other question to ask is just how representative the group is of Australian doctors. Dr Wardle, a NHMRC Research Fellow at the University of Queensland's School of Population Health conducted a survey of every rural GP in NSW and found a third did not refer to alternative medicine providers, a third were incredibly open to it, and a third would refer patients to practitioners that they knew achieved results.

The Australian Medical Association president has withdrawn his support from the lobby group. A number of researchers and doctors have also pulled out of FSM reportedly saying they were not aware of the full picture.

Many Australian medical doctors recognise their limits and refer to natural providers when necessary. However, others continue to believe that modern medicine – which is only 100 years old – is the only way of curing pain.

Natural therapies have been used for more than 10,000 years, and so they deserve a place in society, in Australian universities, and even in modern medicine. According to Australian trauma and general surgeon Dr Valerie Malka, former director of trauma services at Westmead Hospital, while modern medicine is revolutionary when it comes to surgery, particularly in emergencies, for pretty much everything else, traditional, natural or alternative medicine is much more effective.

She says in particular, modern medicine is completely unable to treat or cure chronic illness. Rather than focusing on symptom control, natural medicines work on the body's ability to heal the cause of the illness while modern medicine suppresses the body's healing mechanism with drugs that attack the body's natural defence mechanisms, throwing the immune system out of whack.

Dr Malka believes the attack on natural medicine has more to do with the threat to modern medicine's power base as well as its "unhealthy relationship" with the "trillion-dollar pharmaceutical industry".

This is not the first time natural medicines have been attacked by the medical industry.

Alternative healthcare professionals such as chiropractors, naturopaths, and midwives have been targeted by the American Medical Association (AMA for nearly a century, in spite of a federal court injunction against the AMA in 1987 for illegally trying to create a monopoly in the healthcare market.

Up until 1983, the AMA had held that it was unethical for MDs to associate with "unscientific practitioners" and they labelled chiropractic "an unscientific cult". They also had a committee on "quackery" which challenged what it considered to be unscientific forms of healing. Five chiropractors including Chester Wilk sued the AMA, claiming that the committee was established specifically to undermine chiropractic.

Wilk won the case, with Judge Susan Getzendanner ruling that the AMA had engaged in an unlawful conspiracy in restraint of trade "to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession," also saying that the "AMA had entered into a long history of illegal behaviour".

If you look at the history of attacks on natural healthcare providers over the last 100 years, it is difficult not to associate this attack by FSM as the latest attempt to influence the public into believing that natural medicine is, as it says, "quackery" by spreading propaganda that most of the time is simply not true.

"It's just extraordinary that such undisciplined nonsense is being taught in universities around Australia," Mr Dwyer has said.

Why does this group feel that it has the right to talk this way about natural medicines that are ages old and used by 80 per cent of people across the world?

If FSM really was concerned about patient care and safety in Australia, then perhaps it would investigate medical practices which, unfortunately, seriously injure and kill thousands of people every year, rather than target natural medicine.

Sarah Schwager is an Australian journalist currently working in South America. View her full profile
here.




22.02.2012 22:02:17



USP Labs OxyElite Pro OxyElite Pro is a super thermogenic ... the ultimate fat incinerating formula to date by USPLabs. OxyElite Pro is pharmacist-formulated to deliver fast results for maximum fat loss. It will get you shredded like never before. OxyElite Pro is different from all other fat burners on the market because it has proven ingredients at therapeutic doses for appetite eradication, jolting energy production, and metabolic amplifiers to crank up your calorie burning furnace.

Our price: $39.99
 
Buy it now for $39.99
(List Price: $65.99 Shipping: FREE

Category: Nutrition Bars (T4350





22.02.2012 8:00:00
Criminal gangs are increasingly using the Internet to market life-threatening counterfeit medicines and some have even turned up in legitimate outlets such as pharmacies. Latest estimates suggest that global sales of counterfeit medicines are worth more than $75 billion, having doubled in just five years. Numerous studies have also reported large numbers of websites supplying prescription only drugs without a prescription and people buying Internet drugs despite being aware of the dangers.